July 05, 2006

"Damn The Torpedoes! Full Speed Ahead!"

Farragut.jpg

Today is the birthday, in 1801, of David Glasgow Farragut, commander of the Union Navy during the Civil War. Not too long ago, I reviewed West Wind, Flood Tide by Jack Friend, which tells in great detail the story of Farragut's famous victory at Mobile Bay in August, 1864, during which he uttered the phrase for which he is now mostly remembered. However, his earlier victory at New Orleans and his repeated running of the Mississippi beneath the Confederate batteries at Vicksburg also amply demonstrated his courage, dash and aggressive style.

Here's a bit of Farragut trivia for you Patrick O'Brian fans: Farragut was a midshipman in the Navy during the War of 1812. In 1814, he was serving aboard the U.S.S. Essex when she was caught and defeated by H.M.S. Phoebe off the coast of Chile. Farragut was wounded and captured in the battle. O'Brian used the Phoebe's chase of the Essex as the (very loose) basis for his story of Jack Aubrey's H.M.S. Surprise hunting the U.S.S. Norfolk in The Far Side of the World.

UPDATE: Basil Seal throws me pixilated catnip with this comment:

And pray tell, how did the Norfolk suddenly become French in the questionable film?

Ha! Two reasons, one major and one minor. Firstest, Hollywood had enough sense to realize that the public would never go for a film in which the Brits, in the end, kick the crap out of the Americans. (And it's much easier to heap villainy on the French. If I recall correctly, the Frogs were not simply a rival naval force, but a pack of sneaky Jacobin dogs not much better than common pirates.) Plus, by transmogrifying the enemy, the film doesn't need to get into the causes and issues of the War of 1812, which would just confuse people because how can Jack be the hero if he's fighting for the wrong side?

Seconder, it gave the writers the opportunity to have Jack Aubrey rouse his crew with a line about the Frogs setting up a guillotine in Piccadilly, something the real Aubrey never said. (I have seen the line somewhere, however, and although I haven't yet looked it up, I'm almost sure it's out of one of the Hornblower novels.)

Questionable, indeed.

UPDATE DEUX: Just so that this post doesn't degenerate into another anti-M&C-TFSOTW screed, here's a lithograph of Farragut's successful attack on the defenses of New Orleans, April 24, 1862:

New Orleans.jpg
(Image lifted from the Navy.)

UPDATE TROIS:

And here is a Currier & Ives print of the Union fleet running the shore batteries at Vicksburg:

Vicksburg.gif
(Image courtesy of this site.)

Farragut's ability and willingness to move troops, supplies and ships through this gauntlet was critical to Grant's eventual capture of the city (which occured July 3, 1863, the same day as the Union victory at Gettysburg), to say nothing of the overall Union plan in the west to chop the Confederacy into pieces by taking complete control of the river.

Posted by Robert at July 5, 2006 10:29 AM | TrackBack
Comments

And pray tell, how did the Norfolk suddenly become French in the questionable film?

Posted by: Basil Seal at July 5, 2006 10:48 AM

I finally read the tenth book. Thank God the movie played things differently. Can you say "anti-climax?"

The movie was an absolute amalgamation of scenes (and specific lines) from the first 11 books. To compare it to a specific plot - despite the title and geography of the voyage - is a fool's errand. They wanted to illustrate the doctor's naturalistic obsession and conflict with the whims of the navy, and the Galopagos was perfect. The geography was cool ("Far Side of the World") But the book itself was terribly short on action, so it's almost completely manufactured, pulled from various books. The whole Hollum subplot is almost nothing like the book as well.

The only thing I can't quite figure is how the little Lord Blakeney and that other midshipman got such extended character development, though it's not necessarily a bad thing. Perhaps this "squeaker" character exposition takes place in a book that I haven't read yet.

But anyway, never call me an unkind critic of your criticism, Roberto, for at least I bring gifts:

http://www.s*ate.com/id/2091249/

(replace the asterisk in that URL with the letter "L" - you're crappy comment software finds the word "questionable)

Posted by: Bill from INDC at July 5, 2006 12:03 PM

*your

Posted by: Bill from INDC at July 5, 2006 12:04 PM

Heh, heh. He said "squeaker". Heh, heh.

Posted by: Robbo the LB at July 5, 2006 12:13 PM

Firstest, Hollywood had enough sense to realize that the public would never go for a film in which the Brits, in the end, kick the crap out of the Americans.

I take your point but, do let us remember that in the book, the only reason they caught up to the Norfolk was because they'd shipwrecked in a hurricane. They hardly kicked the crap out of the Americans. Jack and company were only saved from being stuck there by the Surprise showing up.

I'm on The Nutmeg of Consolation in case you're wondering. ;)

Posted by: Kathy at July 5, 2006 01:23 PM

I took my children to the Naval Academy this past weekend. My six year old made the Honor Guard in front of John Paul Jones' tomb laugh out loud. He asked me as he viewed the coffin, 'Daddy, if JPJ was the founder of our Navy, is he buried in water?'

Now my brother is active duty Navy (Lt Cmdr) and he did not give the 2nd Year Classman grief. But it was pretty funny. The Cadet regained his composure and carried on his duties - albeit a wink to my son when we left.

Fair Winds!

Posted by: patd95 at July 5, 2006 05:58 PM

Farragut wasn't at Vicksburg. That was his foster brother David Dixon Porter.

Posted by: Joe Weber at July 6, 2006 08:38 AM

Farragut made an unsuccessful attempt on Vicksburg in 1862 after his victory at New Orleans. He also ran ships past the batteries there, making a critical link up of Union forces north and south of the Confederate strong point.

Porter was there as well and as a matter of fact, the C&I print I posted is of his gunboat fleet running the batteries in 1863.

Posted by: Robbo the LB at July 6, 2006 08:51 AM