February 23, 2006

Smiles, Everybody! Smiles!

George Will on the curiously consistency of research that suggests conservatives are happier than liberals:

Begin with a paradox: Conservatives are happier than liberals because they are more pessimistic. Conservatives think the book of Job got it right (``Man is born unto trouble as the sparks fly upward''), as did Adam Smith (``There is a great deal of ruin in a nation''). Conservatives understand that society in its complexity resembles a giant Calder mobile -- touch it here and things jiggle there, and there, and way over there. Hence conservatives acknowledge the Law of Unintended Consequences, which is: The unintended consequences of bold government undertakings are apt to be larger than, and contrary to, the intended ones.

Conservatives' pessimism is conducive to their happiness in three ways. First, they are rarely surprised -- they are right more often than not about the course of events. Second, when they are wrong they are happy to be so. Third, because pessimistic conservatives put not their faith in princes -- government -- they accept that happiness is a function of fending for oneself. They believe that happiness is an activity -- it is inseparable from the pursuit of happiness.

The right to pursue happiness is the essential right that government exists to protect. Liberals, taking their bearings, whether they know it or not, from President Franklin Roosevelt's 1936 State of the Union address, think the attainment of happiness itself, understood in terms of security and material well-being, is an entitlement that government has created and can deliver.

Read the rest. P. J. O'Rourke made a similar point in one of his books (Parliament of Whores, I believe) when summing up American politics:

I have only one firm belief about the American political system, and that is this: God is a Republican and Santa Claus is a Democrat.

God is an elderly or, at any rate, middle aged male, a stern fellow, patriarchal rather than paternal and a great believer in rules and regulations. He holds men accountable for their actions. He has little apparent concern for the material well being of the disadvantaged. He is politically connected, socially powerful and holds the mortgage on literally everything in the world. God is difficult. God is unsentimental. It is very hard to get into God's heavenly country club.

Santa Claus is another matter. He's cute. He's nonthreatening. He's always cheerful. And he loves animals. He may know who's been naughty and who's been nice, but he never does anything about it. He gives everyone everything they want without the thought of quid pro quo. He works hard for charities, and he's famously generous to the poor. Santa Claus is preferable to God in every way but one: There is no such thing as Santa Claus.

Posted by Robert at February 23, 2006 09:16 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Yup, you're right about the PJ quote, that's from PoW.

Posted by: Brian B at February 23, 2006 09:23 AM

Concerning the Will part... Didn't Burke write something similar in the beginning of "Reflections?" He (Burke) was discussing how people who would use rationality in the creation of social orders would declaim an unintended consequence of rational action as irrational and unrelated...

It struck me as similar at any rate...

Posted by: The Maximum Leader at February 23, 2006 05:18 PM

Mike,

Proof that means can become an end in themselves, and as tyrranical an end as any other.

Posted by: Brian B at February 23, 2006 05:42 PM