February 01, 2006
DLC - Political Cassandra
While I don't usually agree with their positions, I've long thought of the Democratic Leadership Council as the rational wing of the Donk Party. Their analysis of Dubya's political signals in last night's SOTU is pretty good:
In reacting to the president's address, DLC chairman Gov. Tom Vilsack compared Bush to a football coach who is so confident the opposition cannot stop a particular play that he is happy to signal it in advance. That's exactly right. Like the Pittsburgh Steelers running Jerome Bettis right up the middle so long as he continues to gain yardage, the GOP is going to run the national security play right at Democrats until they prove capable of effectively defending it. And this is basically what Bush's offensive coordinator, Karl Rove, told the Republican National Committee week before last.So the challenge is very clear. Democrats must not only find a way to effectively critique the administration's stewardship of national security between now and November, but must also restore their own strength and credibility as smart and resolute warriors in the fight with jihadist terrorism.
Sound advice. And personally, I would be very happy if the Donks were to take it and put forth a viable candidate who genuinely possesses the strength and credibility spoken of here.
But that would mean the Party abandoning the tongue-swallowing, spittle-flying, vein-popping rhetoric of the Moonbat Left, that basically says the jihadist threat is nothing more than a bogey-man cooked up by HitlerMcShrimpyHalliLiarInChief as an excuse to unleash his sturmtruppen on Grandma while setting up as Alexander II and lining his pockets with ooooooooooooil revenues.
I think it unlikely that this will happen. Not only will the Moonbats not listen to the DLC, sooner or later this kind of suggestion may well convince them that the moderates are nothing more than a pack of weak-kneed turncoats. Then the knives will come out.
Yips! to Shay over at Dean's World, who has more thoughts on the subject.
Posted by Robert at February 1, 2006 05:41 PM | TrackBackAbsolutely right.
And the analogy is perfect, because national security is like running the football. It is the safest play in the political book. And if you can't stop it, nothing else matters. Health care? Doesn't matter if you're dead. Education? Doesn't matter if you're dead. Gay marriage? Doesn't matter if you're dead. Until the Dems convince us that they've got a plan to keep us from getting dead, they won't get enough votes to win anything of consequence.
Their best hope of a return to power, paradoxically, is if Bush wins the war on terror. Think of Winston Churchill in 1945. The only necessary man in British politics until the war was over. But once the war was clearly won, there was no need for him, and Labor came to power.
If the Dems had any sense, they'd hawk it out, give Bush every damn thing he wants, throw parades for the troops, and pray silently for the war to end.
Two people get it. Joe Lieberman, whom the Kossacks want to ride out of town on a rail, and Hillary, who is having her doubts and is tacking back to the left. If the Dems all took the Lieberman approach, sensible people could vote for them. But who wants to take a chance on Howard Dean and end up dead?
Yes, they're caught in a trap. The country sees them for what they are, completely incapable of being in charge of national security. But they can't acknowledge the jihadi threat, because their whole desperate strategy to hold their plantation together is telling people the Republicans are the worst villains on the planet.
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at February 1, 2006 11:15 PMJoe Biden gets it too. So do some of the Democratic governors.
Posted by: Dean Esmay at February 2, 2006 05:12 AM"While I don't usually agree with the DLC, I do when they think they are Republicans."
It is the real problem with the Democratic party, they have abandoned the heart of the party to be some sad version of Republican-lite.
Posted by: LB Buddy at February 2, 2006 10:20 AMWell, the half that hasn't become Politburo-lite, that is.
Posted by: Brian B at February 2, 2006 11:44 AM