September 04, 2007

Random Commuter Observations

On the way home this evening, I spotted a bumpersticker that said (as far as I can recall in the wake of the Nats pulling one out in the bottom of the 9th):

Reality has a well-known liberal bias.

(The sticker also had a photo of somebody I did not recognize.)

My first reaction was, "Huh?"

So was my second reaction.

My third reaction was, "No, wait a minute. This is entirely bass-ackwards."

By "liberal", I gather that the sentiment of the sticker was not the Burkian definition of this term, i.e., the sentiment that the average person, if left to himself within a general framwork of laws regarding property and crime, will use his God-given talents to better his condition, thus benefiting both himself and all around him, and therefor contributing to a general rise in the overall condition of Mankind. No, I reckon it was something closer to the Orwellian modern meaning of "a cadre of enlightened intelligensia will take the reins of power in their hands to outlaw all bad things," with the ultimate paradigm that everything not outlawed will be mandatory.

Taking this, I believe the sentiments of said bumpersticker to be complete and utter horseshite.

"Reality" is that Nature is red in tooth and claw. "Reality" is that life is nasty, brutish and short. "Reality" is that every single human being since Adam lives in a fallen state, prey to terrible influences and temptations. And Reality is that no power on Earth can do away with this state of being. Thus, "Reality" -as far as policits goes - is, in fact, extremenly conservative. Not in the Darwinian "every man for himself and the devil take the hindmost" sense. Rayther, in the sense of realistic expectation: we do what we can to suppress, check or tame the more horrible aspects of existence, but we never, ever, believe that we can eradicate them altogether. God alone is the final arbiter.

This all brings back to mind a political conversation I had with my sister-in-law recently. She's a Wellesley grad and although clever, apparently buys into the notion that Mankind's ills (and all other conditions of Nature) can somehow be done away with solely by Mankind its own self. She was genuinely shocked when I said that this was impossible, that at best all we could hope for was some kind of amelioration, that all of us in the business of justice had to keep this in mind as we plodded along, and that in the end we had no choice but to trust in a Higher Power to ensure ultimate equity.

This also brought to mind an article I read this afternoon over at VirtueOnline by Geoffrey Kirk, in which he blasts the Episcopal Church and its Millenium Development Goals. In a way, this is something of a metaphore for why I've finally decided to abandon TEC once and for all and head for Rome. (Yes, the cat's out of the bag.) Here you have all the (granted, well-intentioned) folly of purely humanistic pursuit. I don't especially doubt the intention of the program (at least as far as individual contributors are concerned). However, given the outright hubris of design and execution, I don't for a minute doubt its ultimate failure. (Whether The Powers that Be within TEC fail to recognize this failure and will be surprized in their idealism, or whether they know exactly what is going on and reckon that they will, at least, gain the moral high ground with their flock, I leave to far more disinterested observers.)

Here's the ugly truth: In fact, Reality says, "Praise the Lord but keep your powder dry." Our job as Christians is to work within this dictum. As I recently remarked to Mom, if Mankind was perfectable by earthly means, Jesus would be out of a job.

UPDATE 9/12/07 - Welcome Stand Firm readers! And thankee to Greg for the kind words. What doesn't really come out in this post is that I've been feeling the call of Rome for quite some time now (years, really). The combination of the meltdown of TEC and some personal circumstances was simply the activating agent that finally decided me to follow the call and see what happens. But it's a pretty intense process of inquiry and reflection and at the end of it, who knows what will happen.

Posted by Robert at September 4, 2007 10:04 PM | TrackBack
Comments

It is commendable to help the poor and treat the ills of the body, but I think the Episcopal Church is ignoring the soul. They are forgetting that they already have a commission, as outlined in Matthew 28:16-20, which includes not only works of charity, but also requires them to teach and baptize. The thing the developing world needs more than anything else is leaders who are not monsters; this has to be done by effecting a change of heart. If they could persuade one dictator to do good and avoid evil, a lot of these problems would solve themselves.

Posted by: The Colossus at September 5, 2007 07:11 AM

If mankind were naturally generous, kind and egalitarian we would have no use for lawyers, guns, nor money. Let the power go off for a month and see how pleasant and giving your fellow traveller is. Nature does not provide luxuries, civilized men do. Nature provides that the big ones eat the little ones, if they can find them. And it is a marvel of human endurance that we have created civilized order that allows for the production of a surplus, specialization, rules of conduct, language, etc.

Whatever the Episcopal Church is doing seems to be a political effort designed to interpret the words of the Bible to justify it's own ends ("See, if you read between the lines, then you come to understand that it's just fine to promote abortion and socialized medicine. See? Now doesn't that feel better?"). That sort of justification exists in the brains of our more popular politicians and it too is doomed to it's own hell. The trouble is they can take us with them.

Dan Patterson
Arrogant Infidel

Posted by: Dan Patterson at September 5, 2007 07:56 AM

libruls: "a cadre of enlightened intelligensia will take the reins of power in their hands to outlaw all bad things"

conservatives: "we do what we can to suppress, check or tame the more horrible aspects of existence"

I know this isn't the main point of this post, but frankly I don't see the difference between the description of these two as practiced by our political parties. If you argue that you are talking about higher principles for liberals and conservatives, then the description for liberals is obviously a mischaracterization. There are principled individuals on each side of the debate (I would never endorse the "liberal" statement above), nor do the more authoritarian tendencies of our current Republican Party embrace the small gov. limited interference mantra of "true" conservatives. I would argue that Reality has an anti-politician (and media) bias. The world surrounding the wealthy, the "insider" media, and the political elites represents something completely different than the human condition around the world. This is why, over and over again, we get wars that the majority of humans want no part of.
I won't touch on the path of redemption aspect of this post. That is purely an issue of where someone's faith is placed.

Posted by: LB Buddy at September 5, 2007 09:06 AM

Robbo, the RCC is glad to have the gels and you.

Posted by: LMC at September 5, 2007 01:57 PM

Welcome aboard. We're a bit creaky and leaky ourselves at times, but haven't recently taken axes to the hull while under sail. Like TEC, for example.

I can't wait to see your 'That's My Church!' postings with a yellow and white flag. Nothing like a fresh set of eyes.

Posted by: tdp at September 5, 2007 02:52 PM

"(The sticker also had a photo of somebody I did not recognize.)"

Meh, probably Noam Chomsky.

I may mock Canadians for political apathy, but on the other hand here in Edmonton I'm not subjected to the kinds of bumper stickers I'd see if I lived in in a U.S. college town/state capital like Madison or Austin.

Welcome to Rome. We have our problems (and some cynicism!), but also ultimately we have Hope. And a Pope. If you know what I mean.

Posted by: Meg Q at September 5, 2007 04:45 PM

Holy Mother Church welcomes all who seek Our Lord with a sincere heart.

Posted by: kmr at September 5, 2007 07:46 PM