May 17, 2007

Hair Today

I get pretty tired of these baldness = cancer and we've almost got a cure! articles:

"This is an extremely exciting discovery and shows promise for treatment of follicular disorders such as hair loss and unwanted excess hair," noted Dr Vera Price, director of the University of California, San Francisco Hair Research Centre and scientific advisory board member of Follica

Dr Denis Headon, University of Manchester, said: "Up to now we thought that the number of hair follicles we have is set before we were born and can only go downhill from there. This work shows that new hair follicles are made in adult skin, at least when it is healing a wound. The researchers also found a way to artificially soup up this natural process. It might be simpler than we thought to make new hair follicles as a treatment for hair loss."

Prof Desmond Tobin, University of Bradford said: "This paper provides convincing evidence that the skin has remarkable powers of regeneration. It was long thought that hair follicle development, under physiological conditions, was limited to early developmental process in the embryo. Now Cotsarelis' team have convincingly shown that under the conditions peculiar to the wound-healing environment, the highly complex hair follicle can be created anew from apparently unremarkable cells of the healing epidermis and its underlying dermis.

"Follicular disorders"? How 'bout, "that's just life, dude"!

You can bet that if this process ever hits the market, people will be paying through the (artificially sculpted) nose to get it.

Y'know, if everybody just stopped spending money on this whole recapturing-my-lost-yoot racket and instead used it for prudent coverage of real medical needs, we'd hear an awful lot less yapping about the "middle class health care crisis" than we do now.

SPEAKING OF WHICH, this seems as good a time to float a debate that the LMC and I have been having with our respective Missuses for years now, namely this: Resolved, that coloring hair to hide its grey is a waste of time, energy and money, inasmuch as such grey hair is attractive in its own right.

We take the pro. They take the con. What say you?

UPDATE: And just in case Mrs. LMC or Mrs. Robbo dials in here with wild stories about how the position the LMC and I take is rooted in our opinions of a certain law school professor of yore (who happened to have silver hair and a young face), I can state categorically that this is utter bosh, tosh and drivel.

Posted by Robert at May 17, 2007 11:21 AM | TrackBack
Comments

I take the middle ground on the whole color-to-hide-hair debate. For me, personally, colored hair is too big of a PITA to maintain. Inevitably I end up with roots (b/c no one can seem to match the normal color and just, you know, hide the grey). So for now I'm just letting it be.

Now, should what happened to my folks happen to me, I will probably change my tune. My father was incredibly slow to grey - didn't really have any to speak of until ~62. My mom, on the other hand, was fully grey by 40. So people at church would ask things like "Doesn't your husband come to church? I see you every week with your two daughters and your son." If it gets to the point where I'm grey and Tim is not and people wonder if he's my son, there will be haircolor applied forthwith - no matter what the attraction of grey in its own right.

Posted by: beth at May 17, 2007 11:46 AM

Women with the coloring applied, would look much better with the gray ...

Posted by: kmr at May 17, 2007 11:53 AM

Beth - if you ever get that question, you should turn and plant a big one on Tim, just to seriously mess with your questioner's mind!

Posted by: Robbo the LB at May 17, 2007 11:59 AM

And in this, I'm thinking the whole Ferris Bueller "Do you have a kiss for Daddy?" thing here.

Posted by: Robbo the LB at May 17, 2007 12:01 PM

Now see, that's a very good response. I will keep it in my pocket.

Posted by: beth at May 17, 2007 01:10 PM

Hold on a sec, Tex. It's "just life" until it's your life that's affected. Then it's a bit different story, eh? They could cure my baldness and I'd love them for it.

Unfortunately, however, that just ain't gonna happen until they can figure out how to attack fast growing cancer cells without attacking hair cells, too, which also grow fast.

;)

Posted by: Kathy at May 17, 2007 01:15 PM

Vanity of vanities, all is vanity . . .

Of course, I'm 42, have all of my hair, and have about 2 greys on my entire head.

But no, if I were going bald, I'd simply buzz it short like Bruce Willis.


Posted by: The Colossus at May 17, 2007 01:28 PM

As one who started to turn grey in college and has colored her hair since age 26, I'm for it. However, if my natural hair color were not mousy dishwater blond, but a rich dark brown then I would have let it go grey. But add grey to mousy, dishwater blond and you get dingy dishwater blond and who wants that on their head?

I prefer the occasional hassle of coloring my hair to keep my youthful appearance, thank you.

Posted by: jen at May 17, 2007 01:47 PM

If I could be guaranteed to go grey to a lovely silver, I'd be all for it. But most of the people in my family get an ugly yellowish white that isn't attractive at all. Fortunately for me, I seem to have got the late greying -- instead of the extremely early greying -- genes. So I'm not expecting to find anything but brown hair for another ten years or so. Time will tell though.

Posted by: Jordana at May 17, 2007 03:25 PM

Robbo,

LMC had mentioned the aforementioned law professor - any chance you two could start a "hot females in academia" contest? Beauty and brains are an unbeatable combination - academicly speaking, of course...

Posted by: kmr at May 17, 2007 07:15 PM