May 11, 2007
Environmental Felons of the Day
Back in college one summer I was dating this snooty girl. I was at her house for the first time to do the meet the parents pick up, and her mother asked me if I'd like some Pellegrino.
"No, I'm driving," I said. "Water would be fine."
As a confirmed tap water guy, this just brought a smile to my face:
BOTTLED water, the world's fastest growing beverage, carries a heavy environmental cost, adding plastic to landfills and putting pressure on natural springs, the author of a new US report said today."Bottled water is really expensive, in terms of environmental costs and economically," said Ling Li, who wrote the report for the Washington-based Worldwatch Institute.
While many in developed countries thirst for safety, cleanliness, taste and social cachet when they buy bottled water, more than one billion of the world's poorest lack access to clean drinking water, bottled or not.
And in developed countries, bottled water may be scrutinised using lower standards than plain tap water, the report said.
The environmental impact can start at the source, where some local streams and underground aquifers become depleted when there is "excessive withdrawal" for bottled water, according to the report.
In addition to the energy cost of producing, bottling, packaging, storing and shipping bottled water, there is also the environmental cost of the millions of tonnes of oil-derived plastic needed to make the bottles.
"The beverage industry benefits the most from our bottled water obsession," Ms Ling said. "But this does nothing for the staggering number of the world's poor who see safe drinking water as at best a luxury and at worst an unattainable goal."
Worldwatch estimated 35 to 50 per cent of urban dwellers in Africa and Asia lack adequate access to safe potable water.
Most water is bottled in polyethylene terephthalate, or PET, which requires less energy to recycle and does not release chlorine into the atmosphere when burned. But recycling rates have declined: about 23.1 per cent of PET water bottles were recycled in the United States in 2005, compared with 39.7 per cent 10 years earlier, the report said.
Bottled water costs from 240 to 10,000 times as much as water straight from the tap. In dollars, that means such water sold in most industrialised countries costs $US500 to $US1000 ($605 to $1210) a cubic metre compared with US50 cents (60 cents) a cubic metre in California, where the quality of tap water is high.
World consumption of bottled water more than doubled between 1997 and 2005, with the United States being the largest consumer. US residents drank nearly 28.6 billion litres in 2005, the report found.
Among the countries that use bottled water, India's consumption nearly tripled for the period, and China's more than doubled between 2000 and 2005.
Mexico, Brazil, Italy, Germany, France, Indonesia and Spain round out the top 10.
Somehow my asshat colleagues who were chortling over the idea of parents being environmental felons will be less pleased by this. Oh, if we can only then decry the environmental destruction reaked by proliferating tofu production.
Posted by Steve-O at May 11, 2007 07:34 AM | TrackBackMost bottled water is nothing more than tap water. And who is one of the biggest consumers of bottled water? Hollywood.
Me, I just use a Britta filter on my tap water.
Posted by: rbj at May 11, 2007 08:59 AMDitto on the Britta filter.
But I do love a good Pellegrino. Cleanses the palate. And when traveling in Europe, I do not drink the tap water. I'm not convinced it's safe.
Posted by: The Colossus at May 11, 2007 09:03 AMAs a parent, and having sent thousands of dollars into the coffers of Ternitskey Children's Dentists, it's a big plus for me that tap water has fluoride.
Posted by: dave.s. at May 11, 2007 09:07 AMWater? Who needs it? If the French have taught us one thing, it is that drinking wine all the time is much preferable.
Posted by: Robbo the LB at May 11, 2007 10:13 AM