May 04, 2007

That's My Church! Smackdown Division

EpiscoShield.gif

Archbishop Akinola writes to Her Presiding Priestessness:

2nd May, 2007

The Rt. Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori,
Episcopal Church Center
815 Second Avenue
New York, NY 10017, USA

My dear Presiding Bishop:

My attention has been drawn to your letter of April 30th ostensibly written to me but published on the Episcopal News Service website.

In light of the concerns that you raise it might be helpful to be reminded of the actions and decisions that have led to our current predicament.

At the emergency meeting of the Primates in October 2003 it was made clear that the proposed actions of the Episcopal Church would "tear the fabric of our Communion at its deepest level, and may lead to further division on this and further issues ..." Sadly, this proved to be true as many provinces did proceed to declare broken or impaired communion with the Episcopal Church. Since that time the Primates have established task forces, held numerous meetings and issued a variety of statements and communiquŽs but the brokenness remains, our Provinces are divided, and so the usual protocol and permissions are no longer applicable.

You will also recall from our meeting in Dar es Salaam that there was specific discussion about CANA and recognition - expressed in the Communique itself - of the important role that it plays in the context of the present division within your Province. CANA was established as a Convocation of the Church of Nigeria, and therefore a constituent part of the Communion, to provide a safe place for those who wish to remain faithful Anglicans but can no longer do so within The Episcopal Church as it is currently being led. The response for your own House of Bishops to the carefully written and unanimously approved Pastoral Scheme in the Communique makes it clear that such pastoral protection is even more necessary.

It is my heartfelt desire - and indeed the expressed hope of all the Primates of the Communion - that The Episcopal Church will reconsider its actions - and make such special measures no longer necessary. This is the only way forward for full restoration into fellowship with the rest of the Communion. Further, I renew the pledge that I made to your predecessor, Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold, that the Church of Nigeria will be the first to restore communion on the day that your Province abandons its current unbiblical agenda. Until then we have no other choice than to offer our assistance and oversight to our people and all those who will not compromise the "faith once for all delivered to the saints." (Jude 1:3)

You speak in your letter of centuries old custom regarding diocesan boundaries. You are, of course, aware that the particular historical situation to which you make reference was intended to protect the church from false teaching not to prevent those who hold to the traditional teaching of the church from receiving faithful episcopal care. It was also a time when the Church had yet to face into the challenge of different denominational expressions of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. I also find it curious that you are appealing to the ancient customs of the church when it is your own Province's deliberate rejection of the biblical and historic teaching of the Church that has prompted our current crisis.

You mention the call to reconciliation. As you well know this is a call that I wholeheartedly embrace and indeed was a major theme of our time in Tanzania. You will also remember that one of the key elements of our discussion and the resulting Communique was the importance of resolving our current differences without resorting to civil law suits. You agreed to this. Yet it is my understanding that you are still continuing your own punitive legal actions against a number of CANA clergy and congregations. I fail to see how this is consistent with your own claim to be working towards reconciliation.

Once again please know that I look forward to the day when this current crisis is behind us and we can all be reunited around our One Lord and only Saviour Jesus the Christ. Until then be assured of my prayers for you and The Episcopal Church.

In Christ,
SIGNED
The Most Revd. Peter J Akinola, CON, DD
Archbishop, Metropolitan and Primate of all Nigeria.

Yeee-owwch.

Look, if KJS wants to complete the transmogrification of the ECUSA into trendy Unitarian Universalism, that's her own look-out. But she shouldn't be so shocked, shocked! when the Orthodox refuse to go with her.

Oh, and as an aside, I sincerely hope for her own sake that the PB abandons that "Hey, this isn't the way we do things in the Communion" tack real fast because it makes her look like either a supreme hypocrite or an utter moron.

Yips! to regular reader Oahu Mike, who dropped that one in the Tasty Bits (TM) Mail Sack.

Posted by Robert at May 4, 2007 02:18 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Owchie! What a prefectly proper and polite smackdown!

Posted by: Ith at May 4, 2007 02:50 PM

Doesn't he realize that Africans and the African Church should only be heard from in context of grateful happiness at receiving TEC's mite box charity? How ungrateful!

Posted by: Steve the LLamabutcher at May 4, 2007 02:58 PM

The story behind the story, is now that he's got himself a bishop on American soil, Akinola can build his own church, and with it build his own financial backing, free from TEC's purse strings. My guess is a more theologically robust faith will also tend to draw in people more inclined to evangelical practices such as tithing. In 10 years -- hell, in 5 years -- I'm betting he has more followers under him than Schori does.

By the way, Rowan Williams apparently isn't deterring Akinola either -- he asked him to cancel the trip, to no avail.

http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/?p=1637

Akinola has read Williams and has figured out that if the ABC isn't willing to break communion with Schori, he certainly isn't going to be willing to break it with Akinola.

And if he does, where does the whole global south go? Rome, baby.

I think TEC is in real trouble. They're going to be left with empty churches and end up as a professional clergy of "espiscopi vagantes" ministering to each other at this rate.


Posted by: The Colossus at May 4, 2007 03:26 PM

Love it!

I agree with Colossus - I sense Doom for TEC if they continue on this path.

Posted by: jen at May 4, 2007 03:45 PM

At the risk of offending LLama's more pious readers, and of mixing metaphors, and of abusing the parlant au courant on the internet, it seems that Akinola has "a strong pimp-hand".

He laid it down. I would like to bring my children up with some spiritual aspirations, and related sense of community, but the Anglican Church in Canada is even further gone than TEC; so what would be the point? The pastors have abandoned their flock, but want to keep the pasture?

Posted by: Son of a Pig and a Monkey at May 4, 2007 09:30 PM

Thank God (my) LCMS Lutherans don't allow women into the clergy. *ducks/covers (Really doesn't care: Still think women ought not to be pastors)*

Posted by: Hucbald at May 4, 2007 09:54 PM