May 02, 2006

Here We Goooooo.......

Episco Shield.png

Yes, it's almost time for the 2006 General Convention of the Episcopal Church, this year to be held in Columbus, Ohio.

As those of you who keep up on these things are aware, the Episcopal Church is under a kind of probation at the moment within the Anglican Communion because of the election of Bishop Robinson, a practising homosexual, to the Diocese of New Hampshire in 2003. The more conservative members of the Communion - mostly churches in Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia, were livid that the Episcopal Church should take such a step without at least consulting the Communion first.

The Windsor Report issued in 2004 is an attempt to try and bring the Communion back together, working out some kind of all-encompassing understanding about how to treat this sort of thing. In the meantime, the Episcopal Church has been shut out of certain deliberative functions within the Communion for a period of years and is, as I say, on a kind of probation. One of the requirements of the Windsor Report is that, before the Episcopal Church be allowed out of the penalty box, it must acknowledge that it went too far in accepting Robinson's election.

Naturally, all eyes are on what will be decided at General Convention. Here is the current proposed draft of the apology:

Resolved, the House of _____ concurring, That the 75th General Convention of the Episcopal Church join the House of Bishops’ March 2005 “Covenant Statement” in expressing “our own deep regret for the pain that others have experienced with respect to our actions at the General Convention of 2003 and we offer our sincerest apology and repentance for having breached the bonds of affection in the Anglican Communion by any failure to consult adequately with our Anglican partners before taking these actions.”

This text will be subject to debate and possible amendment. But the rest of the Communion is going to be watching very carefully for weasel words. What the conservative wing wants is not just a regret that anyone has "experienced pain" because of Robinson's election, but a flat-out admission that the Episcopal Church made a mistake in it. We'll see if that happens.

Meanwhile, a friend tells me that the Diocese of California is currently in the process of electing a new bishop and that at least three of the candidates are gay. More on this here. If one of these were to be elected and that election confirmed at this year's General Convention, I believe all hell would break loose, both within the Episcopal Church and also the greater Anglican Communion.

Going to be an interesting summer. LMC - is Rome still accepting applicants?

UPDATE: Sooper Sekret message to the Missus: Ah! Opus Dei! Boogie-boogie-boo!!


Posted by Robert at May 2, 2006 01:04 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Yes

Posted by: LMC at May 2, 2006 01:29 PM

My mom is a Deacon under the outgoing Bishop Lamb, and is attached to a parish that isn't very excited about the current squabble. She assures me that two of the nominees are reasonable and conservative, and actually stand a chance at being elected.

We shall see. I think the D of Nor Cal's general attitude is Bring. It. On. Though there are conservative parishes that will feel the squeeze if it goes that way. Several of the nominees' responses are online here.

Posted by: tee bee at May 2, 2006 03:40 PM

Gevalt. And they say that we have a plethora of differing opinions. Then again, we say we do, too. But we like it that way. (Who else would come up with "that's the Shul I don't go to!")

Posted by: Lysander at May 2, 2006 03:40 PM

You should go to this...and then swing over and visit me. I'm only a couple hours out from Columbus.

Posted by: GroovyVic at May 2, 2006 04:48 PM

All roads lead to Rome, Robbo.

You have to be careful though -- it's a big church, and to navigate between the Dorothy Day-Catholic Worker-Liberation theology types, the hairshirt wearing flagellants, and the militant Sede Vacantists takes some time to figure out. It's a parish by parish, priest by priest process. It might seem like Wal Mart on the outside, but it's really like a big, somewhat dysfunctional patchwork quilt on the inside.

Posted by: The Colossus at May 2, 2006 07:05 PM

Isn't the Bible (you know, that Book Christains use) pretty clear on the issue of homosexuality??(i.e. its wrong) I'm one of those silly old school Baptists so I'm sure I'm missing all kinds of nuance here.

Posted by: nuthin2seehere at May 3, 2006 02:44 AM

I will say it again, if the Church wishes to ordain homosexuals, it should declare that either it is no longer a Paulist denomination or else go through all of Paul's teaching and decide which ones fit and which oens don't declaring, "Paul was wrong on these things."

Posted by: B's Freak at May 3, 2006 10:07 AM

B - sounds like The Jesus Seminar.

Posted by: tee bee at May 3, 2006 11:49 AM

I would be very interested in what happens. I do hope you keep us updated, Robert.

Without commenting on the Protestant Episcopal Church in the USA's actions, I read some of the conservatives' responses and I must remark they have a point. But, I'm not an Espicopalian, so I'm not going to begin pointing fingers at who's arrogant and who's stuffy.

I would not mind if you told us what you think about the whole issue.

Posted by: Muslihoon at May 4, 2006 06:18 PM