April 27, 2006
To The Barricades!
I'm with you, Jonah:
"IRREGARDLESS" [Jonah Goldberg ]Irrespective and regardless of numerous objections from readers, I stand by my position that irregardless is not a word. As this explains it is at best "nonstandard" English. The most I am willing to concede to my critics is that the war to keep irregardless out of common usage is surely a losing one.
For a longer explanation of the "word's" controversy check out World Wide Words
It may be a losing war, but some evils are worth fighting regardless of the odds of success.
Posted by Robert at April 27, 2006 12:07 PM | TrackBackCould you be more pacific?
Posted by: Bill from INDC at April 27, 2006 12:16 PMQuiet, yew.
Posted by: Robbo the LB at April 27, 2006 12:40 PMII picked up the word irregardless from my folks, didn't even know it wasn't a "real" word until I was 24 or so. I still use it, but that has more to do with my family's history of making up words and phrases.
Posted by: KG at April 27, 2006 12:40 PMIrregardless ain't no word.
My legal writing instructor disabused me of the notion that irregardless was a word. About the only good that he did me.
I had an architectural history professor that always used that word. It made me cringe every time. The other thing I can't stand is the death of the collective noun. If you have two dollars in your pocket, do you have "monies?"
Posted by: Babs at April 27, 2006 01:35 PMThen you have evil bastards like this guy trying to turn "concept" into a verb... because, I guess, conceptualize is just too much work
http://verb4concept.blogspot.com/
This reminds me of a woman I once worked for who would always say "mute point" rather than "moot point." Drove us all nuts.
Posted by: bobgirrl at April 27, 2006 05:37 PMGood design!
http://bmqkfzqm.com/povx/upbf.html | http://wwvqojax.com/ozvy/dmta.html
Great work!
Posted by: Wayne at June 27, 2006 06:31 PMWell done!
Posted by: Caleb at July 1, 2006 01:01 PMWell done!
Posted by: May at July 13, 2006 01:59 PM