February 01, 2006
SOTU Reactions
I hadn't meant to watch the speech last night but after talking politics on the phone with our Llama Military Correspondent just before it, I found myself saying "Oh, why the hell not."
In general, and contrary to everybody else who works inside the Beltway, I don't pay much attention to the details of these things. Rather, I listen and watch for overall tone. On that basis, I was quite pleased. Especially with respect to the war, Dubya didn't give the impression he was planning to back down a single, solitary inch. Bully for him, says I.
The other thing I like to watch is audience reaction. It strikes me that it has become something of a game among nooz producers to try and catch senators, congressmen and invitees in various embarrassing moments. Has nobody coached these people yet that they must assume the eyes of the world are fixed on them the entire time? Heh.
Anyhoo, I have no real inclination to analyze the speech or divine What It All Means. Perhaps LMC or Steve-O will do so. Also, if you've got a post on the subject, feel free to leave a trackback.
UPDATE: I forgot to mention that I did not see Kaine's response. But the libs in the office are making fun of him this morning, if that's any indication of how it went over.
UPDATE DEUX: Yup, Goldstein is Da Man.
UPDATE TROIS: By the way, a lot of buzz seems to be focusing on whether Dubya plans to try "confrontation" or "conciliation" with the Donks rolling into the next couple election cycles. I don't think that's the right way of looking at it. Instead, I think the tactic will be to maintain an air of sober maturity and leave the Donks, held hostage by the Moonbat Left, to act out the role of spoiled brat children in full meltdown mode.
Posted by Robert at February 1, 2006 10:40 AM | TrackBackFor some real fun, Check out Jeff at Protein Wisdom's take on it.
I thought it was cute the way the Dems stood and cheered their own obstructionism. Way to win friends there gang! And Hillary didn't do her campaign prospects any favors, coming across as a spiteful, bitter harridan.
Posted by: Brian B at February 1, 2006 10:49 AMWhat it All Means: W. is not buying into the "lame-duck-no-political-capital-Dems-will-sweep-the-midterms" conventional wisdom.
Posted by: LMC at February 1, 2006 11:06 AMDidn't watch, but am really irritated about the call to block human/animal chimera research. It is (as usual with his policies on science) a position based on ignorance and/or politics and not on the importance and value the research may yield. There could be big consequences to a poorly worded law that could hugely disrupt bio research (as happened with the human stem cell legislation).
Posted by: LB buddy at February 1, 2006 11:17 AMOn behalf of all Gryffin-Americans, I am OUTRAGED by that proposal!
Interspecies freak rights!
Posted by: Steve the LLamabutcher at February 1, 2006 11:19 AMLMC,
Yeah, he certainly took a combative tone and I'll give him props for that.
LB Buddy,
You're the second person I've heard react to that, but I don't know anything about the law(s) inquestion, so I can't really comment.
Posted by: Brian B at February 1, 2006 11:20 AMI think the tactic will be to maintain an air of sober maturity and leave the Donks, held hostage by the Moonbat Left, to act out the role of spoiled brat children in full meltdown mode.
With the occasional bitch-slap-back-to-reality when they get too insane.
Posted by: mojo at February 1, 2006 12:52 PMoccasional? You're generous.
Posted by: Brian B at February 1, 2006 03:39 PM