January 30, 2006

Gratuitous Llama Netflix Movie Review

An interesting choice of viewing this past weekend: The Draughtsman's Contract, a tale of lust, greed, intrigue and murder set amongst the gentry during the reign of William & Mary. This movie was recommended to me by one of you after I griped about what a dud Restoration turned out to be. Thanks, whoever it was!

Unlike Restoration, TDC is a genuine period piece, the sort of thing one used to see on Masterpiece Theatre all the time before it decided to get "relevant". The story starts when an arrogant young draughtsman agrees to draw twelve views of a country estate in exchange for twelve sexual favors from the wife of the owner of the place. I went into it thinking that this was going to be something along the lines of "Emmanuelle Does Dutch Billy", but it turns out to be nothing of the sort. Instead, it's a very crafty, difficult murder mystery that goes very deep into the motivations of the various characters involved. It is impossible to let yourself get lazy for an instant, as clues and insights are being batted about almost constantly. Furthermore, it never dumbs itself down. (For instance, part of the tension of the plot turns around Anglo-Dutch and Protestant-Catholic animosities in English society during the reign of W & M, but it never stops to explain them.)

Visually, it's a great movie if you like that sort of thing. The sets (on location in Kent) and costumes are terrific. The only thing I found annoying was the music. (No, it wasn't historically misplaced, but rather composed for the movie itself.) It was both dull and repetitive and soon got to be distracting from everything else.

The one thing I did not get about the film was Naked Statue Guy. If somebody else who has seen this film can explain to me who he was and what his significance might have been, I'd appreciate it.

UPDATE: A good explanation of Naked Statue Guy in the comments. Dunno why I've never come across this phenom before. Probably just as well, given my mime allergies.

Anyhoo, while poking for more information on living statues, I came across this site devoted to the films of Peter Greenaway, which has an interesting review of TDC and a better description of it than I have managed to produce:

The only Peter Greenaway film designed to specifically evoke a certain British time period, The Draughtsman's Contract appears on the surface like some twisted Restoration comedy filled with scheming aristocrats and clever turns of phrase. One of the most enthusiastically received and controversial feature debuts of the early '80s, this remained Greenaway's most high profile effort for eight years until The Cook, the Thief, His Wife and Her Lover firmly secured his position in the art house pantheon. However, Draughtsman actually has much in common with his later work, ranging from the bizarre background details, such as a nude living statue, to the brutal, jarring twist ending.

At a gossipy dinner party, an arrogant young draughtsman, Mr. Neville (Anthony Higgins), is enlisted by the middle-aged Mrs. Herbert (Janet Suzman) to execute twelve drawings of the Herbert estate as a surprise gift for her loutish husband, who is usually away on business. In exchange, Mrs. Herbert will go along with Mr. Neville's sexual demands, once for each drawing. Mrs. Herbert's daughter (Anne-Louise Lambert) becomes more than a little intrigued by the arrangement and enters into a similar bargaining position with Neville, whose fussiness with the layout of each drawing compels him to chase sheep away from the scenery and demand passersby to wear the same clothing each day. However, some inconsistencies in the day to day arrangement of seemingly familiar objects, such as linen and open windows, cause Neville to wonder whether Mr. Herbert is actually away on business... or perhaps is no longer among the living.

As with many Greenaway films, all of the characters are more pieces of a diabolical mind puzzle than living, breathing human beings, bereft even of first names, and the cast gamely acts accordingly. As Neville, Higgins (also in Vampire Circus and Flavia the Heretic under the name Anthony Corlan) has one of his most memorable roles and finds the humor in an essentially repellent character. Without giving too much away, the various layers of the narrative may prove off-putting to viewers who expect to find some redeeming qualities unveiled at the end of the film; there will be no redemption or clever moralizing here. As a document of a historical period, Draughtsman is remarkably convincing, particularly considering its virutally nonexistent budget. The costumes, scenery, and stylish lighting manage to equal Barry Lyndon with a fraction of the resources, while Greenaway's intricate and biting script should keep English majors chortling with delight. Interestingly, his original festival cut of the film ran a full three hours and reportedly contained a number of crucial plot points and explanations which would up on the cutting room floor, including a rationale for the living statue. Unfortunately, this version has not been screened since 1982 and may have been lost forever (if it doesn't exist in one of Greenaway's vaults somewhere).

Emphasis added. So I suppose I'm not alone in not quite understanding how he fit into the plot.


Posted by Robert at January 30, 2006 12:47 PM | TrackBack
Comments

As the commenter who recommended the movie to you, may I explain the significance of Naked Statue Guy? Imagine the difficulty in the pre-MTV days of presenting novel entertainments for your manor's repeat visitors! Remember that one's position in society depended not only on the value of one's lands, the title one held, the closeness of your relationship to the powers that ruled the land, etc., but also, one's ability to provoke positive buzz among the elite, keeping your name in the good type of gossip going around among your upper-crust peers.

So how does one top the midget jugglers at last week's dinner two manors down the valley, or the fresh pineapple served from Lady so-and-so's greenhouse? The living statues one sees today near the Cathedral in Milan and elsewhere are but pale examples of a fairly common novelty act of the movie's era. That the camoflagued fellow might overhear and report on indiscreet conversations among the guests is a possible but unutilized plot device. And the naughty bit where, after a few quick strokes and a cherubic pose, he becomes a water fountain is meant only to provoke a disgusted chuckle from both the dinner guests and the viewers of the movie.

Posted by: Me at January 30, 2006 02:48 PM

And for a movie that belabors the idea of novelty in entertainment to within a hair's breadth of its life, try the French movie "Wit," wherein one's ability to pop out an epigram makes the difference between life and death for the peasants on one's land.

Posted by: me at January 30, 2006 02:50 PM

So I'm the only one who comments on this post - well, well, well. Thank you for the update, I saw this movie once years ago and have wondered idly ever since if the statue fellow was more than that which was presented. The extended version will be out on DVD one day, I suppose, if it still exists.

To calm your mind, everyone I have ever met who has seen this film has wondered about the statue guy, also.

Posted by: me, again at January 31, 2006 11:24 AM