December 08, 2004

Well now

We were wanketted Monday, more of which I have to say later (I mean, you get ten thousand visits because of one post two months ago where you express outrage and disgust because some perv googled up your site looking for nekkid pictures of the person who is now the public spokeswoman for the Central Intelligence Agency? What is this world coming to? I'm a respectable political scientist, for heaven's sake, not the lost Hansen Brother!)

But your LLamas are indeed a multi-threat blog, to say the least: I mean, someone googled up and visited us looking for "new style butter churn porn."

You know, I don't even want to know.

For the love of all that is holy will you perverts just go and leave us alone? We're trying to run a classy establishment here!

Posted by Steve at December 8, 2004 10:14 AM

Butter churns, orgling, Jennifer Millerwise. Doesn't get any better than this.

Posted by: Colossus at December 8, 2004 10:45 AM

We're trying to run a classy establishment here!

I am very sorry to hear of this chance in policy. Please retain you old delightful ways!

Posted by: Dave Schuler at December 8, 2004 11:26 AM

Now you're just begging for her to link you again.


Posted by: Bill from INDC at December 8, 2004 03:14 PM

I have not yet begun to beg.

Posted by: Steve the LB at December 8, 2004 04:01 PM

"...I'm here for the gang bang..."

Posted by: Beck at December 8, 2004 11:32 PM

Is it possible a dedicatd fan tries to manufacture bizzare quereies to find ones that mention the LLamas? Or maybe some people just really have a thing for new style butter churn porn.

Posted by: jpok at December 8, 2004 11:53 PM

Every time I've checked, I get several goggle hits from somebody checking "the pros and cons of censorship." Every time, for months.

Posted by: Jane at December 9, 2004 08:56 AM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?