BECAUSE, LIKE, IT'S ALL ABOUT PROTECTING KIDS AND PROMOTING THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY

Goldstein on the craven angle media angle of trying to get Judge Roberts' children's adoption files unsealed:

Remember: the Times is only fishing around and asking lawyers how they might get private adoption records unsealed because they’re suspicious about John Roberts’ commitment to the privacy rights of women and homosexuals.

BECAUSE OF THE HYPOCRISY!

"Oooh! Oooh! Oooh! Mistah Kotter! MIST-AH Kotter!"

Yes, Horseshack?

"The obvious answer is to get an emminent domain seizure of the Courthouse where the records are kept."

Horseshack, that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

UPDATE: Hugh Hewitt has a comprehensive roundup on the story of trying to get the adoption records unsealed. Suffice it to say that the goal of this is to get the original mother on camera, for Dateline or some other piffle, to do a teary-eyed viewing of the annoucement.....

The whole thing is absolutely sickening.