July 12, 2005

"Effete Slack" Indeed

russell.jpgswayze.bmp

I thought I would just take this opportunity to state again my theory that Kurt Russell and Patrick Swayze are, in fact, the same person.

I say this for no purpose other than to needle Steve-O.

That is all.

YIPS from Steve: It's quite simple, really: The Kurt is able to stink up a movie a new way each time. The man is a genius, an avatar of schlock, a true artist of the mediocre.

Whereas Swayze was always one to many Haagen Dazs from obscurity.

Posted by Robert at July 12, 2005 05:31 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Nobody puts Baby in a corner, not even Snake Pliskin.

Posted by: Brian B at July 12, 2005 06:13 PM

Um, why do you have an autographed picture of Kurt Russell, anyway?

Posted by: owlish at July 12, 2005 06:27 PM

...but if Snake Plisken felt the NEED to put Baby in a corner, she'd damm sure stay put. Even if he had to use drywall screws and caulk.

Posted by: Russ from Winterset at July 12, 2005 06:48 PM

Y'know, Kurt didn't stink in Tombstone. It only looks that way in comparison to Val Kilmer's performance.

Posted by: Russ at July 12, 2005 10:31 PM

Swayze is a lot more butch than Russell.

Posted by: Bill from INDC at July 13, 2005 11:32 AM

How dare you. Kurt Russell is godlike in every way. Did you see Big Trouble in Little China? Genius.

Posted by: Uncle Mikey at July 14, 2005 04:32 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?