May 23, 2005

Just So You Know - Nailing Tracts to the Door Of The Death Star, Dept.

Everybody else is posting their Revenge of the Sith reviews.

I, for one, hereby state categorically that I refuse to see the movie. Maybe when it comes out on pay-per-view. But not before.

Why?

Because I feel that I am being hustled. The tee vee is full of the most blatent and gratuitous plugging - Yoda trying to get some guy's Pepsi being one of the least obnoxious. Many other programmers are jumping on the bandwagon - I saw a few minutes of a Discovery Channel series on "The Science of Star Wars" that had a lot of George Lucas yapping and very little real science. Meanwhile, the press is full of breathless stories about all the financial records the movie is breaking, as well as a fresh batch of reviews discussing Lucas as the Master Myth-maker of our Times.

Well, sorry. I hate this kind of hype. When I sense that much energy being put into an effort to manipulate me into shelling out ten bucks, or whatever it is, to see the thing, I naturally rebel. Especially given the fact that the series has been spiralling in ever since Empire Strikes Back.

More importantly, and particularly after the last two dogs, the message now seems to be that one has to see Revenge, well, because one has to. Because how else will we ever know how things got to be what they were at the beginning of the original Star Wars? Because how else will the circle be made complete?

Screw it. I am perfectly content with leaving the backstory of the original as that: backstory. To date, Lucas' attempts to fill in and expand on that story have been an artistic trainwreck and I don't see anything about this latest opus to indicate that it is any different. Lucas is rightly praised for the original, which was fresh, imaginative and fun. But that was a long time ago and, let's be honest, he plainly has jumped the shark since then. I refuse to let my enjoyment of the original be used to hold me hostage to this latest installment.

UPDATE: Ith has some interesting thoughts about Lucas' downward slide and the (often admittedly conflicted) willingness of fans to overlook this in the name of devotion to what might be called the idea of Star Wars. I believe that various religious excesses, from time to time, have been justified or explained away on similar grounds.

UPDATE DEUX: Ace weighs in with a critique that is both more comprehensive and more blistering than mine. Then again, he actually saw the film.

UPDATE TROIS: M'heh. Beautifully Atrocious Jeff has the Mother of all Star Wars hatred round-ups.

UPDATE, Oh Goddamit, What's French for "FOUR" Again?: Kathy The Cake-Eater posts her take, a la the Reduced Shakespeare Company, whom I've seen on stage. The vision of these guys doing a Star Wars review is exquisite.

UPDATE (see above) FIVE: Via Michelle Malkin, it's the Parade of Unfortunate Star Wars Costumes. If you are taking anti-geek medication, consult your doctor before viewing this link.

Posted by Robert at May 23, 2005 11:46 AM
Comments

It bugs me when people say "let's be honest" about something which clearly is an opinion. You are entitled to your opinion - but to assume that the rest of us fans who don't feel the way you do are being somehow "dishonest" with ourselves is a wee bit arrogant, me thinks.

I'm a fangirl, and I'm proud to say it. I am not without discernment, and I am also not without my disappointments in the other 2 prequels.

I wrote on my own site that the original Trilogy is good enough for me to forgive the other two - and to want to hang in there to see the completed effect. Obviously this is not the case for other people. But this is a matter of personal choice, and not just a matter of me being somehow dishonest.

Keep in mind as well that for a long time I was #2 on Google for "STOP GEORGE LUCAS NOW" - so I'm not exactly a mindless idiot. Dude has pissed me off!!

But in the end it doesn't matter to me. yes, it is the "idea" of Star Wars that keeps me hooked. Uhm ... what's the problem with that?

Again, I don't think anyone should or should not be into this movie, or should or should not see it. There is no moral imperative. It's a matter of personal taste and proclivity, so I don't care. But I do resent the "let's be honest" tone.

My two cents.

Posted by: red at May 23, 2005 12:09 PM

Thanks for the link.

I saw it late Friday night, and by Saturday at 130am when it ended, I was pretty grumpy about it all. Then we got the DVDs (much) later that day, and my animosity softened :) I'm such a sucker! Throw in the documentary I watched last night, and I was all starry eyed and 14 again.

On the other hand, my boss and I just ripped it apart in the parking lot during his smoking break, so maybe I'm reverting back to my 40something grumpy self.

Posted by: Ith at May 23, 2005 12:11 PM

Oh, and of course: I don't presume to tell you what to write on your own blog.

This is just my response.

Posted by: red at May 23, 2005 12:11 PM

I'm still avoiding Attack of the Clones (quickly changed channels last night when I saw the name across the bottom of the TV screen...)

Posted by: LDH at May 23, 2005 12:44 PM

4 = quatre
5 = cinq

:wink:

Posted by: jen at May 23, 2005 10:04 PM

Hmmm. The acronym is ROTS. Coincidence?

Posted by: ahriman at May 24, 2005 07:34 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?