April 12, 2005

Law School Daze

Ann Althouse posts this afternoon about law students taking advantage of their school's Wi-Fi system to IM each other in class and asks if maybe this might not be something to encourage rather than suppress. She says, in part:

We got going on the subject of how maybe we should outright encourage the students to IM, including sending tips and cues to a student who is engaged in Socratic dialogue with the lawprof. What's wrong with students pooling their expertise on the fly? The student doing the speaking is not rendered passive. He or she will still have to read the messages quickly and integrate them with existing knowledge. It could be lively and energizing.

"Lively and energizing" is about right. Allow me to share a precautionary anecdote that several people swear happened to someone in the class ahead of me back when I was doing the law school thing. (Our Llama Military Correspondent, who also heard this story, will back me up on it, even if I get one or two details wrong.)

First year criminal law was taught at my school by a former Marine Corp JAG officer, an ass-kicking Southern Boy who routinely showed up for class with a large coffee mug shaped like a shotgun shell. He was a holy terror to all of his students. Indeed, on damp days I can still feel the old wounds where he got me one Ash Wednesday after I foolishly stayed out too late at a Mardi Gras party the night before.

Anyhoo, this professor's modus operandi was to select a victim at the beginning of class and slam them until he got tired of it. So the first five minutes or so, as he did his introductory spiel, was an agonizing time for everybody, as no one knew whose forehead was hosting that little red laser targeting dot. Once he called a name, of course, everyone else unclenched, but the poor victim sometimes was so shaken as to be rendered witless.

So the story goes that one time this Prof was leading the class through a discussion of the Model Penal Code definition of rape. All of a sudden, he turned on some poor girl and said, "Miss So-and-So, what elements do you need to have in order to satisfy the MPC requirements for rape?"

The girl froze up.

As she sat there, the guy next to her leaned over and whispered, "Penetration."

"Penetration!" she blurted out in a panic.

"Penetration, huh?" said the Prof, "How much penetration?"

The girl froze again.

The guy sitting next to her leaned over and whispered, "Ten inches."

"Ten inches!" she blurted out.

The class held its collective breath.

"Ten inches, huh," said the Prof, "Miss So-and-So, I would suggest that not only are you wrong, you're spoiled."

The class went to pieces. If I remember correctly, they were laughing so hard he eventually had to dismiss them.

Posted by Robert at April 12, 2005 04:30 PM
Comments

Hilarious story. My friends and I first year had a habit of writing down all the comic things the professor said in our notes, it made outlining at the end of the year so much more enjoyable to stumble across a good line every once in a while.

On point though? WiFi is really a horrible thing to tempt an already bored student with. There is no educational value whatsoever in my having internet access in class except for when the Prof. asks somebody to check CNN for a story. Otherwise scanning laptop screens across a class reveals a mecca of shopping, blog reading, e-mailing, and booking travel plans. Every other window is filled with CNN or Drudge. The IMing usually consists of gossip and party plans. We are not challenging each other with hypo's on the UCC or giving hints on answers from the "notes" part after the case that nobody reads.

I don't believe I have ever IM'd anything pertinent to a class discussion except "Is our Professor honestly re-tucking in his shirt for the 40th time? Give it up! Your pants dont' fit!" or "I swear to gawd if that gunner starts another sentence with "I think" I will raise my hand and tell him I don't give two shats what he thinks."

Posted by: Wittysexkitten at April 12, 2005 11:28 PM

That had occurred to me, too. I'm enough of a dinosaur that there was no such thing as WiFi in my day, but it strikes me that the notion of encouraging more meaningful class participation through IM'ing is one of those pie-in-the-sky idealist dreams. As you note, easier communication is much more likely just to encourage kids to surf, gossip and waste time.

The other point that gets missed is that the whole Socratic dialogue thing is designed to get a person to 1) prepare like billy-o and 2)think on their feet. I don't think that encouraging the use of electronic life-lines aids this. And I don't think it would be of any help in the real world, either. Last time I checked, courts don't encourage this sort of thing.

Posted by: Robert the LB at April 13, 2005 08:52 AM

Now better name answer law, sentence order now stop.

Posted by: Bryson at October 23, 2005 01:02 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?